Taylor Swift's Engagement Ring: How Much to Insure It?
- Lavinia Howell
- Sep 22
- 4 min read
Updated: Oct 28

When news broke that Travis Kelce had proposed to Taylor Swift, the internet immediately buzzed — not just about the romance, but about the ring itself. Jewelers and experts have been offering wildly varying estimates of its value. Some place it in the mid six-figures, while others push it toward seven figures or more. People.com+3InStyle+3Hollywood Reporter+3
Let’s assume for the sake of this exercise that the ring is appraised in the ballpark of $500,000 (a midpoint in many expert guesses). How much would it cost to insure something so valuable? Let’s break it down — and show how an insurer might think about it.
Jewelry Insurance Basics: The 1–2 % Rule
For high-value jewelry, most jewelry insurace companies use a rule of thumb: 1 % to 2 % of the item’s appraised value per year as the premium. Investopedia+5NerdWallet+5AAA+5Depending on the policy structure, deductible, location, claims history, and security measures (safe, alarm, etc.), that rate might move somewhat higher or lower.
Here are a few corroborating sources:
NerdWallet notes that jewelry insurance typically costs 1 % to 2 % of the item’s value per year. NerdWallet
AAA similarly projects that a standalone jewelry policy might run within that same 1–2 % range. AAA
GEICO describes that a $5,000 ring “could cost as little as $50 per year” in many cases, consistent with the 1 % rule. GEICO
Progressive also cites “1–2 % of the insured jewelry’s value,” with custom deductibles and discounts possible. Progressive
One “industry-insider” rule of thumb (from jewelry / insurance blogs) is to think in terms of $1 to $2 per $100 of value. C&S Insurance+2Investopedia+2
So for a $500,000 ring:
1 % premium → $5,000/year
2 % premium → $10,000/year
That would be the base premium before adjustments.
Adjustments That Could Raise or Lower That Estimate
In practice, insurers don’t just take 1–2 % and call it a day. Here are factors that might shift the cost:
Deductible: Higher deductibles lower the premium. For a very high-value ring, the insured might choose a deductible of thousands of dollars, which would reduce the annual cost a bit.
Location / risk environment: If Taylor lives part-time in a city with higher crime, or in a high-rise where theft risk or loss may be greater, the rate could increase.
Security measures: If she uses a high-end safe, stores it in a bank vault when not worn, or has an advanced alarm / protection system, insurers may offer discounts.
Appraisal & documentation: Insurers will require a professional, up-to-date appraisal with gemological reports, photos, and documentation. The better the documentation, the less “risk” for the insurer.
Claims history / insurer relationship: If the policyholder has a history of claims, or is bundling many jewelry items, the insurer might adjust.
Policy type & coverage scope: Is it a standalone jewelry policy, a “floater” endorsement on a homeowners policy, or a specialized high-net-worth policy? The level of coverage (loss, theft, mysterious disappearance, damage, worldwide coverage) will affect cost.
Agreed value vs. actual cash value: Many high-end jewelry policies pay “agreed value” (the appraised or insured value) rather than “replacement cost minus depreciation,” which can raise the premium.
Inflation, market risks: Because diamond/gem markets fluctuate, insurers may build in margin for value volatility.
Given those, the 1–2 % rule might be a starting point but the final quote might shift 0.5 ppt (percentage point) in either direction, or more for very exceptional pieces.
A Worked Example
Let’s run a more fleshed-out scenario for fun:
Ring Appraised Value | Base Premium (1 %) | Base Premium (2 %) | Possible Adjusted Estimate |
$500,000 | $5,000/year | $10,000/year | With good security, low deductible: ~$4,000–8,000; in risky environment or high coverage: ~$10,000+ |
$1,000,000 | $10,000/year | $20,000/year | Likely in range of $12,000–18,000 depending on factors |
$750,000 | $7,500/year | $15,000/year | Perhaps $8,000–12,000 in practice |
So if Taylor’s ring is insured at $500,000, a realistic premium might land somewhere between $5,000 and $10,000 per year — possibly leaning toward the lower end with favorable conditions, or higher with more expansive coverage.
If the ring is much more valuable — say $1 million, or approaching the celebrity estimates of $3–5 million in some reports — the premium would scale accordingly.
Why Insuring It Makes Sense (for an Insurance Company to Highlight)
Emotional & PR value: Beyond its dollar value, the ring is symbolic. The stress, media attention, and client expectations demand quality coverage.
Low relative cost: Even $10,000/year sounds big in isolation, but for a client with high net worth and substantial assets, it’s a small fraction to protect something so precious.
Specialized service needed: For ultra high-value items, a generic homeowners policy often lacks the depth (e.g. loss, damage, mysterious disappearance, worldwide coverage). A tailored jewelry policy can better manage high-end risks.
Upsell opportunity: Clients who insure this ring likely have other valuables (jewelry, art, collectibles) to insure too — good cross-selling potential.
Marketing appeal: Writing a blog post like this raises awareness, showcases expertise, and can attract clients who own high-value jewelry.
Key Takeaways
For very high-value jewelry, expect 1 % to 2 % of value per year as a starting premium.
For something like Taylor’s ring (let’s say $500,000), that means $5,000–$10,000/year — adjustable based on deductible, location, security, and coverage.
Always require an up-to-date professional appraisal, gem documentation, and excellent photos.
Encourage clients to improve security (safe, alarm, secure storage) to potentially reduce premiums.
Periodically reappraise — jewelry markets change and coverage needs to stay current.
For ultra-valuable items, don’t rely on standard homeowners coverage — the gaps will be too large.

